<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Blogging is the next &#8220;News Channel&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebyonemedia.com/why-blogging-is-the-next-news-channel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebyonemedia.com/why-blogging-is-the-next-news-channel/</link>
	<description>Connecting Businesses One By One</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:39:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salubri</title>
		<link>http://www.onebyonemedia.com/why-blogging-is-the-next-news-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-57145</link>
		<dc:creator>Salubri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebyonemedia.com/why-blogging-is-the-next-news-channel/#comment-57145</guid>
		<description>Yes, most people who get their news from traditonal mainstream media sources (Murdoch et al) are getting a one sided view. It is important to remember however that there is a reason those sources are mainstream; they are the news sources which have been given political / finanicial support. It will be _very_ easy for the average Joe Soap to subscribe to one or two &quot;popular&quot; or mainstream blogs and start getting another (possibly different) one sided view...

This problem isn&#039;t one of dissemination but of education (and somehow giving people the desire to learn). If you teach Joe Soap that he will be better informed if he reads several blogs on one topic, by authors with various POV, he will thank you and _maybe_ do what you suggest. On the other hand our Joe Soap (accostomed as he is to getting a single POV on things) will probably just shrug and say &quot;who cares, reading one news source has never hurt me and I really don&#039;t have time to subscribe to several blogs...&quot;

I agree however that the &quot;computer in every home&quot; initiative would be a good one! Here in Ireland there have been several political promises to that end over the last few years and there have even been some trials (Ennis - the &quot;millenium town&quot;) but we&#039;re still a good way off...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, most people who get their news from traditonal mainstream media sources (Murdoch et al) are getting a one sided view. It is important to remember however that there is a reason those sources are mainstream; they are the news sources which have been given political / finanicial support. It will be _very_ easy for the average Joe Soap to subscribe to one or two &#8220;popular&#8221; or mainstream blogs and start getting another (possibly different) one sided view&#8230;</p>
<p>This problem isn&#8217;t one of dissemination but of education (and somehow giving people the desire to learn). If you teach Joe Soap that he will be better informed if he reads several blogs on one topic, by authors with various POV, he will thank you and _maybe_ do what you suggest. On the other hand our Joe Soap (accostomed as he is to getting a single POV on things) will probably just shrug and say &#8220;who cares, reading one news source has never hurt me and I really don&#8217;t have time to subscribe to several blogs&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree however that the &#8220;computer in every home&#8221; initiative would be a good one! Here in Ireland there have been several political promises to that end over the last few years and there have even been some trials (Ennis &#8211; the &#8220;millenium town&#8221;) but we&#8217;re still a good way off&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Linder</title>
		<link>http://www.onebyonemedia.com/why-blogging-is-the-next-news-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-56719</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebyonemedia.com/why-blogging-is-the-next-news-channel/#comment-56719</guid>
		<description>Yeah, this is why I think traditional media like newspapers, television and radio still have a major role to play in our society, and probably will for a long time to come. The barriers to access are pretty low. 

In order to get your news online from blogs or news sources from around the world, you need not just a computer, but an internet connection. That&#039;s why the One Laptop Per Child project includes a wireless mesh network component. But in order to watch broadcast television, you just need a box and perhaps some bunny ears.

So there&#039;s an important question to answer. How can we take the richness of content available online and transmit it to mass audiences? 

I think much of what makes online communication special is interactivity. And while submitting a letter to the editor at your local paper isn&#039;t quite the same thing, traditional media can bring their audiences further into the stories by creating web sites for users to submit news and ideas for reporters to cover. The audience isn&#039;t just the group of people who pay your salary, they&#039;re also a rich source of information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this is why I think traditional media like newspapers, television and radio still have a major role to play in our society, and probably will for a long time to come. The barriers to access are pretty low. </p>
<p>In order to get your news online from blogs or news sources from around the world, you need not just a computer, but an internet connection. That&#8217;s why the One Laptop Per Child project includes a wireless mesh network component. But in order to watch broadcast television, you just need a box and perhaps some bunny ears.</p>
<p>So there&#8217;s an important question to answer. How can we take the richness of content available online and transmit it to mass audiences? </p>
<p>I think much of what makes online communication special is interactivity. And while submitting a letter to the editor at your local paper isn&#8217;t quite the same thing, traditional media can bring their audiences further into the stories by creating web sites for users to submit news and ideas for reporters to cover. The audience isn&#8217;t just the group of people who pay your salary, they&#8217;re also a rich source of information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

