Startup Companies Making Money From Free

I have been thinking about the comment left on my post about Blog Talk Radio and their attempt at monetizing their application.  Then I read today over at HipMojo the article about why companies that are basing themselves on ad revenue will fail.  It helped me formulate my own opinion about how companies in the tech world are struggling with making money.  It is a dance that seems hard to learn.

The game plan seems to be along these syllogistic lines.

  • Come up with an application that fills a need.
  • Develop the application.
  • Launch it and see if it scales, get user feedback and adjust its use accordingly.
  • Begin to build your user base until you reach some determined tipping point number. (This is probably the most difficult step in the overall business plan.)

These are the initial outlines I have seen.  During this period you may have an angel investment or a small first round to get to the tipping point number.  The next step is where it gets tricky.  Now that we are at our initial goal, how do we make it profitable?

Companies have built the trust and admiration of their users by providing a great application that is free and useful.  The users are making it an integral part of their lives.  The company has developed and gathered this large community.  They must leverage that into real money.  As I see it, they have but two choices, advertise or begin charging for the service they once before gave away for free.  A blend of these two would be a third choice.

Advertisers want eyeballs and reach.  The users are what they seek, and the more the better.  It’s all about the page views and the numbers generated from people.  Fewer users, the less they pay for your real estate.  Increasing page views and users increases revenue.  This is a hard fact as CEO’s try to guide the company to profitability.  If an application has 100,000 users it is worth more to an advertiser than 10,000 users.  Companies sell to advertisers and tell them, “We have 100,000 users at X amount of page views.”  The media buyers line up for those numbers.  Problem is, companies such as Blog Talk Radio have to sell based on those numbers, but then they must get the customer or users to get behind the plan. If they ask the users permission perhaps they only have 50,000 of the 100,000 users that will allow ads.  Now their property is worth 50% less to advertisers, and they don’t make money at that level.

Their second choice.  They begin charging the users for using the service.  Or as I indicated above the third choice, charging those that elect not to have advertising on the application a premium. The third choice allowing both opt in and opt out income.  This is risky as you may chase off users that were really sold on the application that was free, but not so warm to paying a fee for the service, or having advertisements show up on a usually clean page. 

It’s a chess match played by advertisers and CEO’s and ultimately users.  How can they all be happy?  I’m not sure that is entirely possible but their must be a compromise somewhere.  Companies are struggling to be profitable, advertisers are cutting their spend to increase their return on their own investment, and meanwhile, the user holds the power of being part of the community and whether the user wants to sell their eyeballs.

I have been touting 2008 as “The Year of The User.”  Companies have been building their user base.  The power the users hold with their attention and their eyeballs and presence make the other parties to the dance want to court them.  I’m not sure the answer, but I think ultimately it will raise the cost of advertising, and may force a new metric not based upon the number of eyeballs and page views.  Who flinches first has not been determined.

We Live In A Google World

I have been preaching to people as long as I remember that “We live in a Google World.  I happened upon a post today by Owen Thomas (no I’m not a Valleywag reader, I thank Techmeme) about Google and its global market share.  He refers to a chart done by Efficient Frontier Insights showing the market share of the search engines across the globe.

globalsem

Obviously as the chart shows, Google is enjoying the lion share of search marketing.  Some say it is because they are more targeted with their technology.  Others say it is because they have more advertisers and more publishers.  I think it is because they do search better than any other company.  It will be interesting to see if Microsoft is able to capture a little more piece of the pie and if they can put a dent in the market share owned by Google.  When I hear that Yahoo is thinking of outsourcing  its search to Google, it does not give me much confidence that Microsoft is getting the best in search from Yahoo, and obviously its search engine at MSN is not making much of a race of search in its own right.

UPDATE:  For a deeper analysis check out HipMojo.com

Let the Facebook Auction Begin…Do I hear $10 Billion?

facebook We all know at some point Facebook will be given a value.  If not just for the purpose of a price tag for the moguls out there to aspire to achieve.  It seems that the Wall Street Journal believes that price may be $10Billion or more.  The article states:

Microsoft’s approach to Facebook in recent weeks with proposals to invest in the fast-growing site is part of the software giant’s effort to catch up with the Internet rival Google. If successful, Microsoft’s talks with Facebook could give it an up-to-5% stake in the closely-held startup — a stake potentially valued at roughly $300 million to $500 million, the people familiar with those talks said.

I think that if it’s worth $10Billion to Microsoft, why not $20Billion to Google.  If nothing more than to drive a stake into the heart of the monster we know as Microsoft.  If we get enough of the foxes in the hen house, we could see a bidding war of the big boys, which will be a historical acquisition of a stake in a company that is showing signs of the next big thing.  I say that tongue in cheek of course, because I believe Facebook has them right where they want them.  Now what do you suppose they will do with them?

Searching For A Local Business: Old vs. New

yellowpages3 I can remember the first time I had my name appear in the phone book after I purchased my first home.  Like Steve Martin in the movie “The Jerk”, I danced around and shouted, “I’m somebody now”.  Back then of course, I think computers were something in sci-fi movies, and the Internet had not yet been thought about.  But I can still see that brand new version of the white pages all clean and crisp with my name right there alongside the other 30 people that shared my name.

I was recently watching television when the new Dex advertisement came on and I had a trip down memory lane.  I am still amazed that anyone would be spending much time looking at a Yellow page book in the modern era of finding everything through search.  I think the last time I used a yellow pages directory it was for a booster seat for the kids to reach the table better. 

Then I saw a related article recently put out by eMarketer.com.  The article states that online local advertising will reach 2.9 billion in 2007, which is only 13.4% of the total online advertising market.  The study and article are an interesting look at local advertising.  It made me wonder about the dollars being spent on traditional offline products such as the yellow pages.  I also wondered whether what they were being told about the results they would get as business owners and placing the ads.

I can remember the game back in the day of Yellow page advertising, companies wanted to somehow be listed first in their niche.  If they had a plumbing business, they would call it AAA Plumbing, because then they would be listed as the first alphabetical result listing in the book.  We are not that far off now with the way companies are clamoring for that all important number 1 placement in search results.  Now we are doing it with SEO and other tactics.  The ideal is still the same and that is to be that first listed business under plumbing.  Even though advertising is drastically changing since the old days, in some respects it stays the same.

Google Is The Number 1 Lead Generator

logo-Google At least in our company, we get most of our client’s through Google searches done by companies looking for a blogging consultant or looking to hire a blogger for their company.  I ran through our client list to see the number of companies that have contacted us to provide a professional blogger or to consult them on a social media campaign.  One of the things that struck me was that a large number of them that had reached us or found us as a result of a Google search.

The conversation that prompted me to look at this in this light was a phone call from a prospective client.  We had discussed our services and he was happy with our business model and thought that we would probably do business in the future.  He then told that he had a difficult time finding a service such as ours, but eventually had found it through search.  He explained the roundabout way he happened upon our site, and I recognized a common theme to his search.  Everyone of the other clients had a similar story.

As a small business without a corps of sale people and without a huge marketing budget and a advertising team providing our message, we rely solely upon word of mouth, and being findable.  I preach the same to each of our clients.  In order for your business to be successful, it has to be findable.  It’s nice to see the sermon actually works for me as well.

 

The Death and Perhaps Destruction of a Social Network: A Sad But True Story

soflowlogo In the early part of 2005, I became a member of a social network called Soflow.  This social network was an early vision of its founders.  They could see the future and power of growing one’s profile and gathering contacts for business, and other benefits.  I thought that it was such a good idea, I also invested some of my own time and energy to become a moderator of a group within the network called “Blog Buzz”. 

We would discuss everything doing with the blogosphere and itsblogbuzz_small affect on  business, including advertising, marketing and PR.  The group became 220 members strong and this was before the time of mass invitations we see now with social networks.  There were over 150 forums started and some great conversations took place as a result.  Many advertisers, marketers and PR people were able to enter into the forum and ask simple questions, difficult questions, and ask for suggestions on growing a blog readership, what platforms were available and what blogs could do and what they were capable of accomplishing.  I decided it was important enough of a group to migrate it over and make it a Facebook Group.

Adrants was also a group located in the Soflow network and it had over 4000+ members according to Steve Hall.  It was probably the largest group in the network, but nonetheless, following what people are saying now about the networks’ demise, it’s like losing your favorite pet.  People love to have a place to go and talk with like minded people.  This is what makes social networks so popular.  It’s like a 24/7 cocktail hour. 

 So what are they going to do with all of the data, and all of the information and the gathering of people that have joined in Soflow? At this point it is unclear.  Perhaps the back end will throw a switch and all of that information and wonderful and informative content will be lost.  It this point I know that that principals appear to be moving on to a new application and have asked all of the members to migrate to anwisdmlogo application called Wis.dm.  My feeling is that the people at Soflow could not compete with the likes of Facebook or Myspace, and decided that they could not keep a hold on the people that they had nor could they garner more subscribers.   Wis.dm is obviously not the same type of network as Soflow, but perhaps it was the business model that they wanted to change.  It makes me wonder why there was no purchase of the network or perhaps a merging with Facebook or another network.  The doors close on Soflow on July 31, 2007.  I hope I can resurrect the group to continue the conversation.

 

Can WordPress Compete Against Moveable Type?

I was reading Anil Dash’s post today about the launch of Moveable Type 4. My blog life was born using the Moveable Type Platform. At the time I began blogging, I was of the opinion that MT was the one and only platform for me. It was the choice of many of the top bloggers and had many features that I wanted. When I buy things I do lots of research and checking things out then make my decision based upon my findings. This is what I did when choosing my blogging platform.

Along came WordPress and I heard some great things about that platform. Contributing to a number of blogs over the years, I have seen many different applications, and once I used the WordPress system, I was sold. What was different from Moveable Type? To me it was more user friendly, and the most important reason was spam blocking. I was having a horrible time with Moveable Type’s spam blocking ability. I spent more time deleting spam comments and trackbacks than I was actually writing the posts and reading comments. WordPress was my answer to that problem.

Now Moveable Type has released its newest version of its application, Moveable Type 4. I wonder if they are as user friendly as WordPress and I also wonder about the widgets/plugins/features and whether they have the same coolness as WordPress. I waffled about maybe testing the MT4 Beta, and quickly looked through the site and saw the features offered by MT, and then I finished with the last navigation tab, “Pricing and Purchase”. I was able to quickly make my decision, because one word I did not see…FREE. Until MT decides to offer their application to us commercial users that are on a tight budget, I guess I will have to say that MT will never compete with WP.

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Mediasphere Radio: Beginning Blogging 101

Tris and I had a great time talking about how a business or individuals can get into blogging. We talk about the very basics and things to think about and tips on how to get your company up and blogging.

You can go and listen to the show!

Tags: , Bloggers For Hire, , , Hiring Bloggers, , Mediasphere Radio, One By One Media, Professional Bloggers, , , Tris Hussey

DoubleClick Consumed By Google

It is being widely reported, or actually Twittered, that DoubleClick has been purchased by Google for $3.1 Billion today.  That is a significant sum, and I think a good purchase by Google.  Tris and I both contribute to Business Blog Consulting, owned by Rick Bruner.  Rick works at DoubleClick and we congratulate him on the purchase and hope things go well for him in the future.  It seems I get more news from places like Twitter and Techmeme than other sources, apropos of my last posting.

UPDATE: I guess I should give that other news source some love.

Tags: , , , Business Blog Consulting, Rick Bruner , 

Is the real problem with PayPerPost paid inclusion?

Jason calls out on one of his favorite whipping boys, PayPerPost:

No one likes to be deceived and PayPerPost’s “disclosure policy” is a total joke. They don’t require folks to place disclosure at the top of the blog posts–which I predict the government will force them to do–but rather have folks put a badge somewhere on their page that links to some quasi-disclaimer that says that some of the posts MAY be influenced by being paid.
What a joke.
I would have no problem with PayPerPost if they forced their bloggers to disclose that their posts were paid IN THE FIRST SENTENCE OF THE POST.
Of course, the PayPerLosers will never do that because they know that their advertisers are using them because their
… and Tim Draper’s point that paid advertising had the same reaction leaves out an important point: PAID INCLUSION FAILED!!!!!!!! Hello!?!? People were so pissed off at GoTo/Overture having paid search results that they were forced to move the paid inclusion into Google-style auction based ADVERTISEMENTS.
Source: LA Times busts PayPerPost for deceptive marketing (or “Is Tim Draper in favor of deceptive marketing?!?!)

First, I will disclose that I have signed up for PPP, but I have not done any reviews there (nothing really seemed like it was worth my time or effort).  Next I will also disclose that after Jim’s post, Ted Murphy left a comment and Jim and both said we’d be interested in speaking at the conference.

So now to the meat of the post…

I think Jason has something there.  I remember in the heyday of paid inclusion people felt that they couldn’t trust search results from some providers.  I also remember listening to marketing folks wanting to buy the top position in search engines.  I never supported this.  Ever.  It just seemed fundamentally wrong to game search results that way.

Given the precedent that paid inclusion failed, would even disclosure save PPP and ReviewMe?  What about product marketers who would like to have their stuff reviewed?  Isn’t the model for a marketplace of advertisers and bloggers a good thing?  Clearly disclosure has been a big issue, but not the only issue.  I think there is a place for sponsored posts and a mechanism where companies can openly request reviews and bloggers be compensated for the time they put into those reviews.  Yes, payola could become a real problem.  Frankly it would happen anyway and has been happening for years.  Websites have promoted products without disclosing if they were being compensated since the beginning, so really this isn’t new.  It’s just that “blogging” has been held up as such a “pure” communication medium, that the thought of besmirching that purity with crass commercialism raised the hackles of many, many bloggers.

Putting this into perspective, it’s way, way too early for us to cast judgement on sponsored posts/paid reviews.  I do, however, lament that too many marketers see this as a shortcut into the blogosphere.  “Yeah will just pay people to talk about our stuff, and the blogosphere will just ignite!” Yeah, not so much.  A lot of the paid reviews I’ve read are rather thin.  No analysis, no “I tried it and here’s what I thought..”, lot’s of “This seems like an interesting idea/product…”.

It’s funny, when I ask for NFR licenses for software, it’s only after I’ve tried the software, like it, and would like to be able to do more reviews.  Sometimes I’m just given a license without asking, because I tried the software and thought it was good.  No money changes hands there, but I think everyone wins.

How do professional bloggers fit into this?  I think I might have already talked that one to death, but more companies using PPP should give blogging a try.  Really, it’s not hard.  You might be surprised with the positive comments you get.  Maybe that will be the final outcome, more companies blogging.  And that’s a good thing.